Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • acc acc
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 14
    • Issues 14
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • hla
  • accacc
  • Issues
  • #36

Closed
Open
Created Sep 25, 2021 by Spencer Kiy@spencerkiy🥑Owner

9 degree deflector plates at ISAC seem to be operated 5-10% below their theoretical settings

Most significantly seen in OLIS at IOS:XCB1A, but also routinely observed at other 9 degree deflectors. Most recently I ran the OLIS MWS with B1A (36 degree bender) at theory, but had to lower the XCB1A plates by around 13% to get beam to IOS:FC3. Some brief check of IOS:Q1-3 after showed they were not steering much suggesting beam was on axis through those quads.

I was curious and also checked a tune from OLIS SIS and found that XCB1A was ran 18% low in a tune in 210418_1123-ios-hebt1-db0.snap. So the 9 degree bender is ran low from either direction/polarity.

This behaviour is also observed at:

  • ILT:XCB7
  • ILE2:XCB11
  • ILE2:XCB21

@baartman would be great if someone from beam physics could investigate this when someone has time. Is there a beam physics note on how the voltage of these deflectors is calculated?

Edited Sep 25, 2021 by Spencer Kiy
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking